• Obedience: A Definition and Types
    • Obedience occurs when a person alters his/her behavior in response to a command from a person in authority
      • Authority figure has the power to bring about the change
    • Obedience is a necessary and desirable phenomenon
      • Without obedience to authority society could not function
      • Hobbes suggested that humans were basically out for self interest and only through "social compacts" could we live together
      • Most obedience benefits society (Constructive obedience)
    • Destructive obedience is obedience that harms individuals and society as a whole
      • History provides many examples of destructive obedience:
        • The final solution of the "Jewish problem" by the Nazis
        • The My Lai massacre during the Viet Nam war
        • People's temple mass suicide
        • The slaughter of 1 million Armenians in Turkey in the early 1900s
  • Recurring Themes in Destructive Obedience
      • Milgram (1974)
    • People carrying out a job are dominated by an administrative, rather than a moral, outlook
    • Distinction is made between destroying others and expression of personal feelings (explicit v. implicit attitudes)
    • Values like loyalty, duty, and discipline are adopted as high moral imperatives
    • Modification of language (euphemisms) so that destructive acts don't conflict with moral concepts (e.g., murder becomes "neutralizing" or a "final solution")
    • Looking for authorization from above for acts of destructive obedience


    • Destructive acts are justified by some higher goal (e.g., racial purity)
    • Destructive acts are not talked about
    • No philosophical dilemmas about destructive acts. Career aspirations take precedence
    • When the relationship between authority and subordinates remains intact, psychological adjustments are made to ease the strain of carrying out destructive acts
  • Milgram's Model of Obedience
    • Subjects who obey are acting as agents of authority.
      • The enter the agentic state
        • Attention is drawn away from the victim and toward the authority figure
    • Two factors contribute to the agentic state:
      • Binding factors
        • Initial acts of obedience bind the agent to the authority figure
        • Obedience acts reinforce each other. Each time the agent obeys he/she must justify the act
        • Becoming an agent of authority allows the agent to externalize responsibility for the act
      • Antecedent conditions
        • Personality characteristics that predispose on to obedience
          • Authoritarian submission: Personality trait that involves a submissive, uncritical attitude toward idealized moral authorities of the in-group
        • Agents of authority carefully screened (e.g., SS and torturers)
        • Socialization into the role of obeyer
  • Three Processes Underlying Obedience
      • (Kelman & Hamilton (1990)
    • Authorization
      • Normal moral guidelines are abandoned in favor of those of the authority figure
      • Once authority figure sanctions acts of obedience they are automatically justified
    • Routinization
      • Obedience becomes a habit or a routine part of everyday life
      • Example: Franz Stangl (Commandant of Treblinka)
    • Dehumanization
      • Portraying and thinking of victims of destructive obedience as being subhuman
  • Disobedience I
      • Milgram's Model
    • Disobedience will occur when role strain arises
      • Role strain occurs when a person becomes uncomfortable with obedience behavior
    • Sources of role strain:
      • Cries of pain from the victim
      • Violation of personal moral values
      • Potential retaliation from the victim
      • Conflict between needs of victim and needs of the victim and authority
      • Harming others may be inconsistent with self-image
    • If role strain is not successfully handled, disobedience is likely
  • Disobedience II
      • (Kelman & Hamilton, 1990)
    • Two preconditions for disobedience:
      • Cognitive precondition
        • While obeying a person may not think of disobedience as an option
        • For disobedience to occur, one must think of disobedience as a viable option
      • Motivational precondition
        • Individual in obedience situation must be willing to go against existing norms and accept the consequences of disobedience