Go to Reading Guides
| Go to Syllabus
| Go to Course
Schedule
Go to Assignments
| Go to Irwin's Main Page | E-Mail Irwin
COM 557, Spring 2008 – Reading Guide Questions for March 4
For Scheutz Ch. 6.
First, read 131-134
for the background on the Lindbergh kidnaping.
1. So how do the opening statement and direct examination work together
to build a narrative?
2. What does she identify as the challenges of building a narrative
from testimony?
3. How does the advice from trial advocacy manuals she presents on the
bottom of 135 relate to what you have learned in other COM classes?
4.What is the relationship between the stories witnesses tell and the
themes introduced in opening statements? What can attorneys do to
foster that relationship?
5. Distinguish these types of witnesses: primary, expert, records,
occurrence, reputation.
6. How does the advice on ordering testimony she identifies on 140
relate to what you have learned in other COM classes?
7. What are the ways attorneys link testimony to exhibits and to other
testimony? Why is that desirable?
8. Put the prosecution direct examination strategies she identifies –
definition, inferences, validation – in your own words. Do the
same for the defense direct examination strategies she identifies –
redefinition and reconstruction.
Go to Reading Guides
| Go to Syllabus
| Go to Course
Schedule
Go to Assignments
| Go to Irwin's Main Page | E-Mail Irwin
Copyright ©
2001-2008 Irwin Mallin
Last Updated: 29
February 2008
URL:
http://users.ipfw.edu/mallini/557rdg20080304.html