|
The General's Daughter and My Cousin Vinnie |
|
Both of these movies involve what happens after a crime - specifically, murder - has been committed. Interestingly, in neither one is the guilty person charged or convicted. However, the crimes take place in drastically different circumstances. In My Cousin Vinnie two passing-through college students are charged with the murder of a convenience store clerk in a rather random, or routine, manner. In The General's Daughter neither the motive for the crime, nor who might be "guilty" become very clear until the end (and even then the question of guilt remains unanswered). The writing assignment is to compare the rules that relate to investigation and the admission of evidence in the two settings, particularly in the way(s) they differ and the reason(s) for those differences. You are strongly encouraged to discuss any and all part(s) of the movies that you think significant in terms of court procedures. As suggestions only, your discussion might, for example, comment on:
In all of that, the result should be an objective, logical analysis. |